The Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Governing Board approved a package of affordable and workforce housing incentives Dec. 13 to help address the housing crisis that is impacting Lake Tahoe’s environment and communities. The targeted changes to Lake Tahoe zoning regulations will lower the cost to provide affordable and workforce housing, benefit water quality and reduce traffic and vehicle use, according to TRPA officials.
Following three hours of public testimony, the board adopted the policy changes with refinements based on community and board member feedback.
Rising property values are only part of the housing crisis affecting Lake Tahoe communities, according to TRPA. The development caps and building design requirements enacted by the agency decades ago to save the lake are partly driving the market toward large, single-family homes versus smaller, more affordable multi-family units such as duplexes, triplexes and apartments.
With a limited amount of new development allowed under the Lake Tahoe Regional Plan, major renovation, redevelopment and new projects must achieve multiple goals, TRPA officials say. Existing incentives encourage water quality and transportation improvements on commercial and tourist accommodation properties. Extending additional incentives to deed-restricted multi-family projects is a key priority for the agency.
“When you look at this breathtaking lake and then recognize what is happening to people and businesses in our communities, it’s heartbreaking,” said TRPA Executive Director Julie Regan. “In resort communities in Tahoe and across the nation, it’s getting harder for people to live where they work. The status quo is unacceptable and these changes are one of many solutions needed.”
The approved policy changes require a high level of stormwater best management practices to protect water quality. The goal is to build public-private partnerships that deliver more affordable housing throughout Lake Tahoe.
Highlights on the new housing incentives:
They apply only to projects close to transit and services that provide permanently deed-restricted units for lower income and local workers.
Projects in town centers can apply for more flexible building designs with additional land coverage, up to 9 additional feet of height, more units allowed within the building envelope and reduced parking if the project will implement alternatives like a car-share or shared-parking agreement.
Smaller projects in surrounding multi-family residential zones can apply for similar, stepped down incentives to encourage more duplexes, triplexes and accessory dwelling units.
“Our communities are struggling,” said TRPA Governing Board Chair and Placer County District 5 Supervisor Cindy Gustafson. “I am seeing boarded up buildings in my community of Tahoe City for the first time in the 40 years I have lived here. This approval gives the Tahoe Basin one more tool that the local jurisdictions can choose to use, but we know we need to keep making progress on additional solutions to strengthen our communities and protect some of Tahoe’s most at-risk community members.”
Within a year, local governments are required to align the changes with their local area plans. Area plan updates also allow local communities to tailor the extra allowances as long as they work toward regional housing goals.
Starting in early 2024, TRPA staff will initiate a multi-year effort to more comprehensively integrate housing, equity and climate goals into key land-use and water quality programs. The agency was recently awarded $2.4 million in grant funding from the California Department of Housing and Community Development to help with further improvements that will benefit the entire region.
To get involved visit trpa.gov/housing and sign up for the agency’s housing eNews.
When the city approves a business to establish itself there, knowing there is not housing for the employees, it is committing a wrong. I realize that the motive is to bring in more revenue to the city, however, it should not be up to the taxpayers to then subside the housing for their employees.
"The development caps and building design requirements enacted by the agency decades ago to save the lake are partly driving the market toward large, single-family homes versus smaller, more affordable multi-family units such as duplexes, triplexes and apartments". If the goal was to restrict buildings for the health of the lake, how can larger and more buildings achieve the same goals?
I believe that in resort communities the goal should be to downsize the number of businesses and reduce the size of the government that relies on increased revenue. Focus on rehabbing existing buildings for housing instead of starting over ground-up on undeveloped land. Encourage less growth, not more, and make businesses more accountable for their employees.
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism
that is degrading to another person. Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness
accounts, the history behind an article.
(1) comment
When the city approves a business to establish itself there, knowing there is not housing for the employees, it is committing a wrong. I realize that the motive is to bring in more revenue to the city, however, it should not be up to the taxpayers to then subside the housing for their employees.
"The development caps and building design requirements enacted by the agency decades ago to save the lake are partly driving the market toward large, single-family homes versus smaller, more affordable multi-family units such as duplexes, triplexes and apartments". If the goal was to restrict buildings for the health of the lake, how can larger and more buildings achieve the same goals?
I believe that in resort communities the goal should be to downsize the number of businesses and reduce the size of the government that relies on increased revenue. Focus on rehabbing existing buildings for housing instead of starting over ground-up on undeveloped land. Encourage less growth, not more, and make businesses more accountable for their employees.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.